| 000 | 02761nam a22004218i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CR9780511760679 | ||
| 003 | UkCbUP | ||
| 005 | 20200124160234.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 100506s2010||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
| 020 | _a9780511760679 (ebook) | ||
| 020 | _z9780521118316 (hardback) | ||
| 020 | _z9781107470927 (paperback) | ||
| 040 |
_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP |
||
| 043 | _ae-uk-en | ||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aKD3395 _b.D66 2010 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a344.4203/21 _222 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aDonnelly, Mary _c(Law teacher), _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aHealthcare decision-making and the law : _bautonomy, capacity and the limits of liberalism / _cMary Donnelly. |
| 246 | 3 | _aHealthcare Decision-Making & the Law | |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2010. |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (xxiv, 320 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics ; _v12 |
|
| 500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). | ||
| 505 | 0 | _aAutonomy : variations on a principle -- Autonomy in the law -- Capacity : the gatekeeper for autonomy -- Capacity assessment in practice -- Autonomy, rights and decision-making for patients lacking capacity -- Treatment for a mental disorder : a case apart. | |
| 520 | _aThis analysis of the law's approach to healthcare decision-making critiques its liberal foundations in respect of three categories of people: adults with capacity, adults without capacity and adults who are subject to mental health legislation. Focusing primarily on the law in England and Wales, the analysis also draws on the law in the United States, legal positions in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and Scotland and on the human rights protections provided by the ECHR and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Having identified the limitations of a legal view of autonomy as primarily a principle of non-interference, Mary Donnelly questions the effectiveness of capacity as a gatekeeper for the right of autonomy and advocates both an increased role for human rights in developing the conceptual basis for the law and the grounding of future legal developments in a close empirical interrogation of the law in practice. | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_aMedical care _xLaw and legislation _zEngland. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMedical care _xLaw and legislation. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMedical care _zEngland _xDecision making. |
|
| 650 | 0 |
_aMedical care _xDecision making. |
|
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9780521118316 |
| 830 | 0 |
_aCambridge law, medicine, and ethics ; _v12. |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760679 |
| 999 |
_c517933 _d517931 |
||