| 000 | 01982nam a22003498i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CR9781139107990 | ||
| 003 | UkCbUP | ||
| 005 | 20200124160330.0 | ||
| 006 | m|||||o||d|||||||| | ||
| 007 | cr|||||||||||| | ||
| 008 | 110712s2014||||enk o ||1 0|eng|d | ||
| 020 | _a9781139107990 (ebook) | ||
| 020 | _z9781107020894 (hardback) | ||
| 040 |
_aUkCbUP _beng _erda _cUkCbUP |
||
| 050 | 0 | 0 |
_aBD184 _b.A36 2014 |
| 082 | 0 | 0 |
_a122 _223 |
| 100 | 1 |
_aAhmed, Arif, _eauthor. |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvidence, decision, and causality / _cArif Ahmed, University of Cambridge. |
| 246 | 3 | _aEvidence, Decision & Causality | |
| 264 | 1 |
_aCambridge : _bCambridge University Press, _c2014. |
|
| 300 |
_a1 online resource (ix, 250 pages) : _bdigital, PDF file(s). |
||
| 336 |
_atext _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
| 337 |
_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia |
||
| 338 |
_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier |
||
| 500 | _aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). | ||
| 520 | _aMost philosophers agree that causal knowledge is essential to decision-making: agents should choose from the available options those that probably cause the outcomes that they want. This book argues against this theory and in favour of evidential or Bayesian decision theory, which emphasises the symptomatic value of options over their causal role. It examines a variety of settings, including economic theory, quantum mechanics and philosophical thought-experiments, where causal knowledge seems to make a practical difference. The arguments make novel use of machinery from other areas of philosophical inquiry, including first-person epistemology and the free will debate. The book also illustrates the applicability of decision theory itself to questions about the direction of time and the special epistemic status of agents. | ||
| 650 | 0 | _aDecision making. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aEvidence. | |
| 650 | 0 | _aCausation. | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 |
_iPrint version: _z9781107020894 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139107990 |
| 999 |
_c522529 _d522527 |
||